CONTRIBUTING.md: New section on which branch to use

This commit is contained in:
Silvan Mosberger 2023-08-14 02:11:50 +02:00
parent 2a99b5a703
commit 0bd8c9b4f9

View file

@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ This section describes in some detail how changes can be made and proposed with
- The name of the branch hints at the change you'd like to implement, e.g. `update-hello`.
- The base of the branch includes the most recent changes on the `master` branch.
> **Note**
> Depending on the change you may want to use a different branch, see <!-- TODO link to branch section -->
> Depending on the change you may want to use a different branch, see [][branch].
```bash
# Make sure you have the latest changes from upstream Nixpkgs
@ -106,6 +106,54 @@ This section describes in some detail how changes can be made and proposed with
git push --force-with-lease
```
### Which branch to use
[branch]: #which-branch-to-use
Most changes should go to the `master` branch, but sometimes other branches should be used instead.
Use the following decision process to figure out which one it should be:
Is the change [acceptable for releases][release-acceptable] and do you wish to have the change in the release?
- No: Use the `master` branch, do not backport the pull request.
- Yes: Can the change be implemented the same way on the `master` and release branches?
For example, a packages major version might differ between the `master` and release branches, such that separate security patches are required.
- Yes: Use the `master` branch and [backport the pull request](#backporting-changes).
- No: Create separate pull requests to the `master` and `release-XX.YY` branches.
Furthermore, if the change causes a [mass rebuild][mass-rebuilds], use the appropriate staging branch instead:
- Mass rebuilds to `master` should go to `staging` instead.
- Mass rebuilds to `release-XX.YY` should go to `staging-XX.YY` instead.
See [staging](#staging) for more details about such changes propagate between the branches.
#### Changes acceptable for releases
[release-acceptable]: #changes-acceptable-for-releases
Only changes to supported releases may be accepted.
The oldest supported release (`YYMM`) can be found using
```
nix-instantiate --eval -A lib.trivial.oldestSupportedRelease
```
The release branches should generally not receive any breaking changes, both for the Nix expressions and derivations.
So these changes are acceptable to backport:
- New packages, modules and functions
- Security fixes
- Package version updates
- Patch versions with fixes
- Minor versions with new functionality, but no breaking changes
In addition, major package version updates with breaking changes are also acceptable for:
- Services that would fail without up-to-date client software, such as `spotify`, `steam`, and `discord`
- Security critical applications, such as `firefox` and `chromium`
#### Changes causing mass rebuilds
[mass-rebuilds]: #changes-causing-mass-rebuilds
Which changes cause mass rebuilds is not formally defined.
In order to help the decision, CI automatically assigns [`rebuild` labels](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/labels?q=rebuild) to pull requests based on the number of packages they cause rebuilds for.
As a rule of thumb, if the number of rebuilds is **over 500**, it can be considered a mass rebuild.
To get a sense for what changes are considered mass rebuilds, see [previously merged pull requests to the staging branches](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=base%3Astaging+-base%3Astaging-next+is%3Amerged).
### Rebasing between branches (i.e. from master to staging)
From time to time, changes between branches must be rebased, for example, if the
@ -197,29 +245,7 @@ So e.g. the [`nixpkgs-unstable` branch](https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/tree/ni
Nixpkgs in its entirety is tied to the NixOS release process, which is documented in the [NixOS Release Wiki](https://nixos.github.io/release-wiki/).
Changes should generally always go to the `master` branch.
Once in `master`, it can be backported to the `release-YY.MM` branches if [acceptable](#acceptable-backport-criteria).
A change should only go to the `release-YY.MM` branch directly if `master` doesn't need that change.
#### Acceptable backport criteria
Backports are only accepted to supported releases.
The oldest supported release (`YYMM`) can be found using
```
nix-instantiate --eval -A lib.trivial.oldestSupportedRelease
```
The release branches should generally not receive any breaking changes, both for the Nix expressions and derivations.
So these changes are acceptable to backport:
- New packages, modules and functions
- Security fixes
- Package version updates
- Patch versions with fixes
- Minor versions with new functionality, but no breaking changes
In addition, major package version updates with breaking changes are also acceptable for:
- Services that would fail without up-to-date client software, such as `spotify`, `steam`, and `discord`
- Security critical applications, such as `firefox` and `chromium`
See [this section][branch] to know when to use the release branches.
#### Backporting changes
@ -340,13 +366,6 @@ The staging workflow is used for all main branches, `master` and `release-YY.MM`
- `staging`/`staging-YY.MM`
- `staging-next`/`staging-next-YY.MM`
#### Mass rebuilds
Which changes cause mass rebuilds is not formally defined.
In order to help the decision, CI automatically assigns [`rebuild` labels](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/labels?q=rebuild) to pull requests based on the number of packages they cause rebuilds for.
As a rule of thumb, if the number of rebuilds is **over 500**, it can be considered a mass rebuild.
To get a sense for what changes are considered mass rebuilds, see [previously merged pull requests to the staging branches](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=base%3Astaging+-base%3Astaging-next+is%3Amerged).
## Reviewing contributions
> **Warning**