See https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/222792#pullrequestreview-1356114111
You can't just `lib.filter _ lib.systems.all` -- that throws away
important information, leading to nixpkgs disagreeing with itself
like this:
```
$ NIXPKGS_ALLOW_BROKEN=1 nix-instantiate . -A pkgsStatic.systemd
error: Package ‘systemd-252.5’ in ... is only supported on ... x86_64-linux but not on requested x86_64-linux, refusing to evaluate.
```
After:
```
$ NIXPKGS_ALLOW_BROKEN=1 nix-instantiate . -A pkgsStatic.systemd
error: Package ‘systemd-252.5’ in ... is not available on the requested hostPlatform:
hostPlatform.config = "x86_64-unknown-linux-musl"
package.meta.platforms = [
"aarch64-linux"
"armv5tel-linux"
"armv6l-linux"
"armv7a-linux"
"armv7l-linux"
"i686-linux"
"m68k-linux"
"microblaze-linux"
"microblazeel-linux"
"mipsel-linux"
"mips64el-linux"
"powerpc64-linux"
"powerpc64le-linux"
"riscv32-linux"
"riscv64-linux"
"s390-linux"
"s390x-linux"
"x86_64-linux"
]
package.meta.badPlatforms = [
{
isStatic = true;
parsed = { };
}
]
, refusing to evaluate.
```
See docs.
Follow-up work:
- Existing packages should be converted
- `defaultPkgConfigPackages` should assert on `meta.pkgConfigModules`
and let `tests.pkg-config` alone test the build results.
CC @sternenseemann
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
`hasUnsupportedPlatform` was not updated with #37395, so it does not
understand attrsets in `meta.[bad]platforms`. In particular,
attrsets in `meta.badPlatforms` will "fail open" and be ignored.
Let's use `lib.meta.availableOn` instead of duplicating its logic.
Thanks to @alyssais for [noticing][1].
[1][https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/194148#discussion_r990817610]
Co-authored-by: sternenseemann <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
The documentation for `meta.sourceProvenance` in
`doc/stdenv/meta.chapter.md` says: "the `meta.sourceProvenance`
attribute should be a list containing one or more value..."
Let's update check-meta.nix to require that `meta.sourceProvenance` is
a list, as the documentation says, rather than a single element.
Adding two extra keystrokes `[` and `]` when filling out this field is
an insignificant burden for package authors, and being able to assume
that the `meta.sourceProvenance` field is always a list greatly
simplifies any code that acts on the value of this field.
Since `meta.sourceProvenance` was just merged a few hours ago now is
the easiest time to fix this: nobody is using the feature yet.
In specific cases, combining the `checkMeta` and `checkMetaRecursively`
config options would result in `error: infinite recursion encountered`
fixes#193296
This is needed in order to mark a certain derivation containing a Nix
expression tarball to Hydra so that it is recognised as a channel.
When I first got an evaluation error due to using this meta attribute, I
was under the impression that nobody outside of Vuizvui[1] is using this
feature and that we don't have any occurrence of isHydraChannel in
Nixpkgs.
However, when working around[2] the issue I assumed that it's not
something that should be included in Nixpkgs because we're not using it
there.
It turned out that my assumption was wrong and we *do* use the attribute
in Nixpkgs, namely via releaseTools.channel, which is similar to what
we're doing in Vuizvui.
Since we already include a bunch of undocumented attributes in
metaTypes, it only makes sense to add isHydraChannel as well since it's
actually documented in the Hydra documentation[3].
[1]: https://github.com/openlab-aux/vuizvui
[2]: https://github.com/openlab-aux/vuizvui/commit/e0685e81b3fdc43a272f0
[3]: 53335323ae/doc/manual/src/jobs.md (meta-fields)
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
it may be what the license handling code does, but it's confusing and not very useful
Co-authored-by: Adam Joseph <54836058+a-m-joseph@users.noreply.github.com>
This warning logs when a package has no maintainers. It will stay silent
if `meta.maintainers` is not set at all, only complaining when it is an
empty list. In the future a separate warning could be added to allow for
that stricter behavior. Or this warning could be changed.
This will allow for adding more validity types in the future, such as a
warning type. (which is in the next commit in this series)
This is NOT a breaking change because validity.valid is never exposed
outside of `stdenv.mkDerivation`.
Flake users that use a command like `nix build nixpkgs#hello` on a
broken/insecure package will not be able to use an environment variable
to override that behavior, unless they pass `--impure` to the command.
Co-authored-by: pkharvey <kayharvey@protonmail.com>
Support `mainProgram` as an attribute of `meta` for packages.
This is an attribute used by [`nix
run`](https://nixos.org/manual/nix/unstable/command-ref/new-cli/nix3-run.html#description)
to customize the main program of a package.
For example, `pkgs.neovim` provides a `/bin/nvim` executable which users
would (almost certainly) prefer `nix run` to execute instead of a
non-existing `/bin/neovim`.
Signed-off-by: Ana Hobden <operator@hoverbear.org>
* stdenv/check-meta: change to allowlist and blocklist
* Update pkgs/stdenv/generic/check-meta.nix
Co-authored-by: Graham Christensen <graham@grahamc.com>
Currently it's not possible to determine the reason why a package is
unavailable without evaluating nixpkgs multiple times with different
settings. eg.
nix-repl> :p android-studio.meta
{ available = false; broken = false; unfree = true; unsupported = true; ... }
The following snippet is an example that uses this information to query
the availability information of all packages in nixpkgs, giving an
overview of all the packages currently marked as broken, etc.
{ pkgs }:
with import <nixpkgs/lib>;
let
mapPkgs =
let mapPkgs' = path: f: mapAttrs (n: v:
let result = builtins.tryEval (v ? meta); in
if !result.success then {} else
if isDerivation v then f (path ++ [n]) v else
if isAttrs v && v.recurseForDerivations or false then mapPkgs' (path ++ [n]) f v else
{}
);
in mapPkgs' [];
getMeta = path: drv:
if drv.meta ? available then
let meta = {
pkg = concatStringsSep "." path;
inherit (drv.meta) broken unfree unsupported insecure;
};
in builtins.trace meta.pkg meta
else {};
metaToList = attrs: flatten (map (v: if v ? pkg then v else metaToList v) (attrValues attrs));
in metaToList (mapPkgs getMeta pkgs)
There were two issues:
* builtins.getEnv was called deep into the nixpkgs tree making it hard
to discover. This is solved by moving the call into
pkgs/top-level/impure.nix
* when the config was explicitly set by the user to false, it would
still try and load the environment variable. This meant that it was
not possible to guarantee the same outcome on two different systems.
A package's meta.license can either be a single license or a list. The
code to check config.whitelistedLicenses and config.blackListedLicenses
wasn't handling this, nor was the showLicense function.
